On musl based distributions, u-boot 2010.03 fails to build with:
u-boot-2010.03/include/u-boot/crc.h:29:50: error: unknown type name 'uint'
uint32_t crc32 (uint32_t, const unsigned char *, uint);
The issue was fixed in the newer u-boot-2018.03 version, this commit
backports the change to the older version used by ar71xx/ath79.
Signed-off-by: Andy Walsh <andy.walsh44+github@gmail.com>
[add commit message from PR description]
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
OpenWrt uses ancient u-boot thats not reproducible.
There are multiple upstream changes that introduce
reproducible builds like:
859e92b775fd8ebcfacc591eaf621b677c95b6f7
(not used here - the CMD_DATE/TIMESTAMP functionality
seems to be disabled by config)
70d39f57146a6cb94736db39c770c3d95e07bedb
f3f431a712729a1af94d01bd1bfde17a252ff02c
2d9efa1227262249d381ed5d9d341cbdba76e62d
Instead of changing the Makefile too much
this changeset just tries to use the
changes in Makefile from current upstream git f5fd45f
*Should* fix issue reported by reproducible lede page:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/lede/lede.html
Compile tested only
(verified w. hexdump & md5sum)
Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirchen@web.de>
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
Andy Walsh
Felix Fietkau
Dirk Neukirchen
Felix Fietkau
Luka Perkov
John Crispin
Gabor Juhos