apm821xx: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as
the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use
generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS
files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming
there as well and provide proper examples.

1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist
2. https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation

Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> [split up]
v19.07.3_mercusys_ac12_duma
Petr Štetiar 5 years ago committed by Christian Lamparter
parent 87dcf24548
commit a692eecda1

@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
};
};
gpio_keys_polled {
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
};
};
gpio_keys_polled {
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
};
&POB0 {
gpio_keys_polled {
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
};
&POB0 {
gpio_keys_polled {
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
};
};
gpio-keys-polled {
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

Loading…
Cancel
Save