From 27c20a1ef5da22b91c1074a6dd044f0401ddfb2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20Gonz=C3=A1lez=20Cabanelas?= Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:55:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bcm63xx: image: don't add the CFE to the sercomm factory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit There is no need to include the CFE bootloader in the Sercomm factory images. There might be a case when this could be useful: - We are running the stock firmware on the first Sercomm image - The second partition storing the botloader was erased (unlikely) Even in this case flashing an image without a bootlader is harmless. Don't include the bootloader in the factory image creation and rid of the risk of flashing factory images with an untested bootloader partition. Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas --- target/linux/bcm63xx/image/Makefile | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/Makefile b/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/Makefile index c962e531a9..294db6eb32 100644 --- a/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/Makefile +++ b/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/Makefile @@ -218,20 +218,8 @@ define Build/cfe-sercomm-part --part-name rootfs_lib \ --part-version $(SERCOMM_VERSION) - rm -rf $@-bootloader - mkdir -p $@-bootloader - cp $(KDIR)/bcm63xx-cfe/$(CFE_RAM_FILE) $@-bootloader/$(CFE_RAM_JFFS2_NAME) - $(call Build/cfe-jffs2,$@-bootloader) - $(call Build/pad-to,$(BLOCKSIZE)) - $(TOPDIR)/scripts/sercomm-partition-tag.py \ - --input-file $@ \ - --output-file $@.bootloader \ - --part-name bootloader \ - --part-version $(SERCOMM_VERSION) - mv $@.kernel_rootfs $@ dd if=$@.rootfs_lib >> $@ - dd if=$@.bootloader >> $@ endef define Build/cfe-sercomm-load